Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALEXANDRATOS, N.
Right arrow Articles by HRABOVSZKY, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1982 Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics

other

Power inputs from labour, draught animals and machines in the agriculture of the developing countries

NIKOS ALEXANDRATOS, JELLE BRUINSMA and JANOS HRABOVSZKY*

Economic and Social Policy Department, Agriculture Department, F.A.O. Via delleTerme di Caracalla 00100 Rome Italy

Received April 1, 1982; final version received July 1, 1982

Summary

This article describes a model developed and used to estimate power input requirements by source for increasing agricultural production in the developing countries. Production increases are defined for 28 crops, each of which is grown in one or more of six classes of rainfed and irrigated land at specified yield levels. The estimation and analysis is carried out for each one of 90 developing countries, which together account for 98% of the population of the developing world, not counting China.

Given crop production increases specified as above, the model calculates first the requirements for total power input and subsequently distributes it to the three sources of power (labour, machinery and draught animals).

The results show that for a 3.5% annual increase in crop production in the aggregate of the 90 developing countries 1980–2000 (the growth rate 1966–81 was 2.9%) the total power input (in terms of man day equivalents) should grow at 2.2% and the labour input at 2.1%, implying an employment elasticity of 0.52. Mechanization should advance most rapidly in the higher income developing countries (Latin America, Near East), while in all regions, animal traction would be substituted by machinery.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.