Skip Navigation

European Review of Agricultural Economics 2008 35(4):519-546; doi:10.1093/erae/jbn040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lankoski, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ollikainen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2009; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Bioenergy crop production and climate policies: a von Thunen model and the case of reed canary grass in Finland

Jussi Lankoski

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

Markku Ollikainen

University of Helsinki

Corresponding author: Markku Ollikainen, Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki, PO Box 27, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: markku.ollikainen{at}helsinki.fi

Received November 2006; final version received October 2008

We examine the potential of bioenergy crops to offset greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, assuming homogeneous agricultural land and distance-dependent transport costs. Variable transport costs define the socially and privately optimal extensive margin of the bioenergy crop production and imply that fertiliser intensity differs across locations. Under current policy, private fertiliser application is suboptimal, requiring location-specific input, transport or output subsidies. The theoretical model is applied to reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in Finland, which offsets emissions from peat in electricity production. If oats is the alternative crop, and taking permit price of CO2 emissions as the proxy for climate benefits over the life cycle, reed canary grass production is socially optimal even 100 km away from the power plant and still offsets more than 6 tons/ha of CO2 emissions from peat.

Keywords: von Thunen model, climate benefit, bioenergy crops, emission permit market, nutrient runoff

JEL classification: Q18, Q24, Q25, Q28


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.