Skip Navigation


European Review of Agricultural Economics Advance Access originally published online on August 21, 2006
European Review of Agricultural Economics 2006 33(3):361-389; doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbl017
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
33/3/361    most recent
jbl017v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerstens, K.
Right arrow Articles by Squires, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow D24 - Production; Cost; Capital and Total Factor Productivity; Capacity
Right arrow Q22 - Fishery; Aquaculture
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2006; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A short-run Johansen industry model for common-pool resources: planning a fishery's industrial capacity to curb overfishing

Kristiaan Kerstens

CNRS-LEM (UMR 8179), IESEG School of Management, Lille, France

Niels Vestergaard

Department of Environmental and Business Economics and Centre for Fisheries and Aquaculture Management and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark

Dale Squires

US National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, California, USA

Corresponding author: Niels Vestergaard, Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9–10, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark. Telephone: +45 65504181, Fax: +45 65501091, E-mail: nv{at}sam.sdu.dk

Received December 2005; final version received May 2006

Current methods for assessing capacity and its utilisation in fisheries operate at the firm-level, but neglect industry capacity. Here, we introduce the Johansen-Färe measure of plant capacity of the firm into a multi-output, frontier-based version of the short-run Johansen industry model. The model determines firm capacity utilisation such that current industry outputs are maintained, while minimising the use of fixed inputs at industry level and assuming abundant variable inputs. Policy extensions relevant to combating overfishing include tightening quotas, seasonal closures, linking economic and plant capacity, decommissioning schemes and area closures, implementation issues and equity considerations. The application to the Danish fisheries reveals substantial overcapacity in the Danish fleet.

Keywords: plant capacity, Danish vessels, industry, planning, efficiency


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EUR REV AGRIC ECONHome page
P. Bogetoft, K. Boye, H. Neergaard-Petersen, and K. Nielsen
Reallocating sugar beet contracts: can sugar production survive in Denmark?
Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., March 1, 2007; 34(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EUR REV AGRIC ECONHome page
J. L. Andersen and P. Bogetoft
Gains from quota trade: theoretical models and an application to the Danish fishery
Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., March 1, 2007; 34(1): 105 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.