Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lansink, A. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bäckman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, [...]
Right arrow D24 - Production; Capital and Total Factor [...]
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Review of Agriculture Economics Vol 29 (1) (2002) pp.51-65
© 2002 Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics

Effciency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994–1997

Alfons Oude Lansink, Kyösti Pietola and Stefan Bäckman

Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Agrifood Research Finland, Helsinki, Finland
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Summary

This paper uses data envelopment analysis to compute overall technical and input-specific technical efficiency measures of conventional and organic farms in Finland. Moreover, productivity measures are determined, indicating differences in technology employed by organic and conventional farms. The data are from crop and livestock farms over the period 1994–1997. The results show that organic farms are on average more efficient relative to their own technology, but use a less productive technology than conventional farms.

Keywords: organic farming, productivity, technical efficiency, DEA, Finland


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EUR REV AGRIC ECONHome page
P. Bogetoft, K. Boye, H. Neergaard-Petersen, and K. Nielsen
Reallocating sugar beet contracts: can sugar production survive in Denmark?
Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., March 1, 2007; 34(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.