Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RICKERTSEN, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow M37 - Advertising
Right arrow Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics

research-article

The effects of advertising in an inverse demand system: Norwegian vegetables revisited*

KYRRE RICKERTSEN

Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway P.O. Box 5033, N-1432 As, Norway

Received July 1, 1997;

Summary

Rickertsen et al. (1995) found no significant positive effects of advertising on vegetable demand using the almost ideal demand (AID) system. Using SUR in a quantity-dependent system assumes that prices are predetermined. During the Norwegian growing season, strict import regulations have been applied and quantities are apparently predetermined. To investigate whether the AID or a corresponding inverse demand system is appropriate, the endogeneity of prices and quantities are tested. Advertising expenditures are included as shift variables in both systems. Quantities appear to be predetermined, while prices are endogenous and the inverse model is selected. No positive effects of advertising are found

Keywords: almost ideal demand system, generic advertising, inverse demand system, vegetable demand


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.