Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ABLER, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by SHORTLE, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Q18 - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy
Right arrow Q28 - Government Policy
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press and the Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics

research-article

Environmental and farm commodity policy linkages in the US and the EC*

DAVID G. ABLER and JAMES S. SHORTLE

The Pennsylvania State University

Received May 1, 1991;

Summary

This paper analyses restrictions on agricultural chemicals in the US and the EC under various farm commodity policy scenarios using a partial equilibrium simulation model. The model has three regions (US, EC, rest of the world) and four commodities (wheat, maize, coarse grains, soybeans). Medium- and long-run impacts are derived. Given existing farm programmes, US landowners gain from chemical restrictions while EC landowners generally lose. Given bilateral elimination of farm programmes, both US and EC landowners gain from chemical restrictions. Bilateral farm programme elimination without chemical restrictions induces a shift in chemical usage from the EC to the US.

Keywords: Agricultural chemicals, agricultural policy, environment, fertilizer, sustainable agriculture


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.